January opened the year with a more confident tone across global markets. Markets were focused on the path of monetary policy, early corporate earnings signals and geopolitical developments that shaped sentiment throughout the month. Equity markets generally advanced and commodity markets rallied sharply. The combination created a constructive backdrop that helped most major asset classes deliver positive returns to start the year.
Large-cap U.S. equities posted a modest opening month. The S&P 500 Index gained 1.5%, supported by pockets of strength in energy and communication services, along with steady demand for higher quality large cap companies within consumer staples. Small cap stocks performed even better as concerns grew about the impact generative AI might have on software-related companies and investors rotated into more attractively valued areas of the market. The Russell 2000 Index rose 5.4% in January. Softer inflation, improving business surveys and an overall economic backdrop that remains resilient helped fuel the asset class.
International developed equities outpaced U.S. large caps. The MSCI EAFE Index advanced 5.2%, helped by broad strength across Europe and Japan. European equities found support from central bank communication that pointed to stable policy in the near term, while inflation remains moderate. Japanese equities rose as well. Investor concerns surrounding geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and Eastern Europe remained present but did not dampen the regional rally. A weakening U.S. dollar further helped the space. Emerging markets delivered the strongest equity performance in January. The MSCI EM Index climbed 8.9%, led by strong gains in South Korea, Mexico and Brazil. Technology shares in Asia rebounded sharply, supported by improving semiconductor demand and favorable trade expectations tied to early conversations about reopening supply channels between major economies. Latin America benefited from resurgent commodity demand and further currencies.

Fixed income markets generated modest gains as interest rate volatility remained. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index returned 0.1% for the month. Treasury yields moved modestly higher during the period as the expectation for the number of rate cuts in 2026 diminished and the markets digested the announcement of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair nominee. Credit markets extended the positive tone. High yield bonds, measured by the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index, rose 0.5%, supported by narrowing spreads, resilient corporate fundamentals and a favorable economic backdrop.
Diversifying areas of the markets such as REITs and commodities also opened the year in positive territory. U.S. Equity REITs gained 2.8% during January. The sector benefited from early signs of improving fundamentals in data centers, industrial properties and select residential markets. Concerns around office properties persisted, but strength in other areas outweighed the drag. Commodities delivered the most notable performance of the month. The Bloomberg Commodity Index surged 10.4%, driven by strength in energy and industrial metals. Energy prices, particularly crude oil and natural gas, moved higher as extremely cold temperatures swept across much of the country. Precious metals saw favorable returns as well, although gold prices sold off at the end of the month, limiting the gains.
January brought mixed impact from AI during the month. Investor concerns took hold about the potential disruption generative AI would have on software companies during the month following a new tool for Anthropic’s Claude large language model that can help with tasks for legal, marketing and data analysis. Shares of Oracle and Salesforce fell over 15% and 19%, respectively, for the month and resulted in the software sector being down 13.1%, wiping out nearly $800 billion in market value. On the other hand, semiconductor companies, particularly abroad, continue to benefit from the demand for chips and flash memory. Emerging markets were a standout in the month. Having thoughtful diversification to areas of the market such as non-U.S. equity and small and mid-cap U.S. stocks may help balance portfolios and capture the benefits from a broadening of AI, and we are seeing this take shape so far in 2026.

After weeks of the markets speculating, President Trump announced the nomination of Kevin Warsh to be the 17th chair of the Federal Reserve. If confirmed by the Senate, Warsh would take the lead seat in mid-May when Powell’s term as chair ends. It is important to note that Powell’s term on the board of governors does not end until 2028, unless he voluntarily steps down, and that Warsh would be replacing Stephen Miran. The market initially reacted viewing Warsh as a “hawk” based on his past Fed governor experience and his comments on balance sheet reduction. Interest rates ended the month modestly higher from where they began at the end of last year and the price of gold fell over 7% on the day of the nomination. But Warsh’s views on current productivity could help lay the groundwork for future rate cuts.
The nomination brought the topic of Federal Reserve independence once again to the forefront of investor concerns, something that has been ongoing over the past 18 months. It is important to note this is not the first time in history that the subject has been discussed. In fact, Warsh, who served as a Fed Governor from 2006 to 2011, addressed the issue in a 2010 speech in New York: “Independence in the conduct of monetary policy is at the core of advanced modern economies. And it can be too easily forgotten by those who have only known its benefits. If the Federal Reserve lost its independence, its hard-earned credibility would quickly dissipate. The costs to the economy would be incalculable: Higher inflation, lower standards of living, and a currency that risks losing its reserve status.” The institutional design should minimize short-term political influence and based on the current terms (depicted below), the current administration has limited ability to appoint new governors assuming terms are served in full.

Overall, January provided a constructive start to the year across global markets. Diversifying positions away from U.S. large cap have been beneficial to start the year (small-cap U.S. equities and non-U.S. equities in particular). A resilient economy and strong corporate fundamentals are supportive for markets, but we remain mindful of current valuations, market concentration and the uncertainty created by geopolitical events.
Disclosures & Definitions
Views expressed are as of the date(s) referenced, based on the information available at that time, and may change based on market and other conditions. These are the views of the authors’ of this piece and may differ from other advisors within RubinBrown Advisors, LLC. RubinBrown Advisors does not assume any duty to update any of the information. Sources used and referenced in preparing this commentary are deemed to be reliable, but RubinBrown Advisors has not verified their accuracy. Information provided in this email is for informational and educational purposes only, it should not be construed as a specific recommendation of any security, sector or investment strategy. Please contact your investment advisor to discuss your personal portfolio. Investment decisions should be based on an individual or family’s own goals, time horizon and tolerance for risk.
RubinBrown Advisors, LLC is an SEC-registered investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. RubinBrown Advisors, LLC is wholly-owned by RubinBrown LLC.
Comparisons to any indices referenced herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to imply that actual returns or volatility will be similar to the indices. Indices cannot be invested in directly. Unmanaged index returns assume reinvestment of any and all distributions and do not reflect our fees or expenses. Market returns shown in text are as of the publish date and source from Morningstar or FactSet unless otherwise listed.
Material Risks
All investing involves risk including the potential loss of principal. Market volatility may significantly impact the value of your investments. You should consider these factors when making investment decisions. We recommend consulting with a qualified financial adviser to understand how these risks may affect your portfolio and to develop a strategy that aligns with your financial goals and risk tolerance.